Member of the Committee on Industrial Policy and Transport.
Member of the All-Russian Political Party "United Russia".

Mikhail Pokhlebaev was born on May 25, 1958 in the city of Zlatoust, Chelyabinsk region. In 1981 he graduated with honors from the Moscow Higher Technical School named after N.E. Bauman, receiving the specialty “radio engineer”. He was drafted into the armed forces of the Soviet Army, where from 1982 to 1985 he worked as an engineer in the Military Assembly Brigade Group in the city of Zlatoust-36 at the Instrument-Making Plant.

Subsequently, Pokhlebaev successively held the positions of district engineer, senior expert of a special department, head of the general technical and conversion departments of the enterprise, deputy head of the Department of Nuclear Ammunition Industry of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy. He retired in 2004 with the rank of colonel.

From 2005 to 2008, he took a course in the EMBA program “Strategic Finance” at the Academy of National Economy under the Government of the Russian Federation. Subsequently, Mikhail Ivanovich served as deputy head of the Nuclear Munitions Industry Directorate of the Federal Atomic Energy Agency. He was Deputy Director and then Acting Director of the Department of Nuclear Munitions Industry of the State Corporation Rosatom.

From 2009 to 2014, he served as General Director of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise Instrument-Making Plant in the city of Trekhgorny. Then Pokhlebaev acted as general director, and in April 2015 he became general director of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise PA Mayak.

Mikhail Pokhlebaev was elected as a deputy of the Legislative Assembly of the Chelyabinsk Region of the VI convocation on September 13, 2015. Member of the Committee on Industrial Policy and Transport. He is a laureate of the Russian Government Prize in the field of science and technology, State Advisor of the Russian Federation, 3rd class.

Married. Has two daughters, seven grandchildren.

Awards of Mikhail Pokhlebaev.

Order of Honor.

Medal "300 years of the Russian Navy".

Badge “E.P. Slavsky."

Anniversary medal “50 years of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Defense Ministry.”

Medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia “Participant in the elimination of fires in 2010.”

Medal "55 years of military unit 3442".

Badge “90 years of the Military Commissariats of the Russian Defense Ministry.”

Medal of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation “For Merit in Nuclear Support”.

Medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia “XX years of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia.”

Medal of the FSTEC of Russia “For strengthening the state information security system.”

Jubilee medal "200 years of internal troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia."

Medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia “For the Commonwealth in the Name of Salvation.”

RAEP RP badge “For interaction and social partnership”, II degree.

Commemorative medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia “Marshal Vasily Chuikov”.

Insignia “For Services to the Nuclear Industry”, II degree.

Medal of Saints Cyril and Methodius Equal to the Apostles.

Anniversary medal of the Russian Ministry of Defense “100 years of the Air Force.”

Laureate of the All-Russian project “Effective Personnel Management”.

Deputy of the Legislative Assembly of the Chelyabinsk Region since September 13, 2015
Faction: United Russia
Constituency: Ozersky constituency No. 4
Member of the committee: Legislative Assembly Committee on Industrial Policy and Transport
Born on May 25, 1958 in Zlatoust. Graduated with honors from the Moscow Higher Technical School named after N.E. Bauman (1981), radio engineer. Completed a course of study under the EMBA program “Strategic Finance” at the Academy of National Economy under the Government of the Russian Federation (2005-2008).
Served in the Armed Forces (1982-2004): engineer of the military assembly brigade group, assistant, district engineer, senior expert of the special department, head of the general technical and conversion department, deputy head of the Department of Nuclear Ammunition Industry of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy.
He worked as Deputy Head of the Department of Nuclear Ammunition Industry of the Federal Atomic Energy Agency (2004-2008), Deputy Director of the Department of Nuclear Ammunition Industry, Acting Director of the Department of Nuclear Ammunition Industry of the State Corporation Rosatom (2008-2009).
In 2009-2014 - General Director of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Instrument-Making Plant" (Trekhgorny).
Since December 2014 - Acting General Director of FSUE PA Mayak, and since April 2015 - General Director of FSUE PA Mayak.
Laureate of the Russian Government Prize in the field of science and technology, State Advisor of the Russian Federation 3rd class, colonel. Award "Gratitude of the Governor of the Chelyabinsk Region."
Married. Two daughters, seven grandchildren.
Hobbies: tourism, hunting, photography, beekeeping.
State awards and insignia:
Order of Honor, medal “300 years of the Russian Navy”, badge “E.P. Slavsky", anniversary medal "50 years of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Ministry of Defense", medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia "Participant in the elimination of fires in 2010", medal "55 years of military unit 3442", badge "90 years of the Military Commissariats of the Russian Ministry of Defense", medal of the Russian Ministry of Defense "For Merit in nuclear support", medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia "XX years of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia", medal of the FSTEC of Russia "For strengthening the state system of information protection", anniversary medal "200 years of internal troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia", medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia "For the Commonwealth in the name of salvation", breastplate RP RAEP badge "For interaction and social partnership" II degree, commemorative medal of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia "Marshal Vasily Chuikov", insignia of the State Corporation "Rosatom", "For services to the nuclear industry" II degree, Honorary diploma and the highest award of the International Foundation of Slavic Literature and culture - medal of Saints Cyril and Methodius Equal to the Apostles, anniversary medal of the RF Ministry of Defense “100 years of the Air Force”. Laureate of the Russian Government Prize in the field of science and technology, laureate of the All-Russian project “Effective Personnel Management”.
Awarded with gratitude from the Governor of the Chelyabinsk region.

The holiday did not take place

Over the past couple of months, Mayak PA has undergone several inspections. And there were plenty of reasons for this. Since the fall of last year, information began to leak into the press that something was wrong in the kingdom of Denmark, that is, Pokhlebaev’s. Mikhalyvanvch is stirring up something, cheating on contracts, feeding his beloved friend Kumar with orders for capital construction, and even pays him for unfinished work in specie coins, he planned to produce Korean machines, but still won’t release them, and so on. We won’t even mention such a trifle as Pokhlebaev’s ten-year guarantee for asphalt that hasn’t lasted even ten months.

It is with a feeling of deep satisfaction that we will say that our editors have made a significant contribution to debunking the myth about the “industrialist of the year” Pokhlebaev, clearly showing where and what he actually does. Let us recall a short list of our publications:

Well, after the already famous letter from Deputy Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation for the Ural Federal District Yuri Ponomarev to the head of Rosatom Alexei Likhachev appeared in the press, it became clear to even die-hard Pokhlebaev fans that the matter was rotten. Let us recall fragments from this message.

“The results of the analysis showed that at the Federal State Unitary Enterprise PA Mayak, with the connivance of General Director Pokhlebaev M.I. An unacceptable practice of ineffective management of an enterprise’s funds has been formed, characterized by gross violations of imperative norms of federal legislation and provisions of corporate law, entailing the creation of privileged conditions for certain commercial organizations and their unjust enrichment to the detriment of the rights and legitimate interests of FSUE PA Mayak...

Thus, the current situation at the enterprise requires the immediate intervention of the Rosatom State Corporation. I propose to organize a departmental audit of the financial and economic activities of FSUE PA Mayak, based on the results of which, if there are grounds, to resolve the issue of the responsibility of the general director of the enterprise M.I. Pokhlebaev. and other guilty persons, including the possibility of their continued holding in their positions..."

It was after this letter that inspections at the plant began. What are their results? Of course, these departmental documents are confidential, but in general, according to our information, the painting is by no means an oil painting. If we were talking about a less significant enterprise and, accordingly, not such a large figure as its general director, then a manager of a lower rank would have long ago been polishing the bench in the pre-trial detention center and humiliatingly asking for a deal with the investigation.

All this gives us reason to assert that Mikhail Pokhlebaev, popularly referred to as Misha-Prazdnik, will very soon leave his post as general director of Mayak, to which he brought so much harm, however, most likely, his resignation will not be loud and public, as this and accepted by Rosatom. Mikhalyvanovich will apparently go into honorable exile, but the appropriate wording for this will be chosen.

But even if Pokhlebaev is dismissed (and this is inevitable), he, unfortunately, will remain a deputy of the Legislative Assembly of the Chelyabinsk Region. His attitude towards his voters is evidenced by the fact that Deputy Pokhlebaev never reported on his work to the voters, the residents of Ozersk. Moreover, he did not even deign to answer the questions asked of him by the residents of Ozersk, considering them “offensive.” Mikhail Ivanovich, aren’t you at all offended by the fact that you have to live with us, with the common people, in the same city and breathe the same air?

However, like it or not, you have to pretend to be a deputy. So Mikhalyvanich has become more active lately and began holding meetings with voters. On June 26, together with the head of the administration E. Shcherbakov, he held an on-site reception for citizens in Novogorny. Meanwhile, these belated attempts to be closer to the people do not bring results and certainly will not bring any results. How do we know this?

There is such a site sluga74.ru. Go to it, don’t be lazy. The resource contains a rating of State Duma deputies from the Chelyabinsk region, a rating of deputies of the Legislative Assembly of the region, etc. The ratings were obtained through online voting by readers. So, among the sixty deputies of the Legislative Assembly, the last, sixtieth place is occupied by Mikhail Pokhlebaev. Moreover, he ranks by a huge margin: at the time of writing this article, Mikhalyvanovich’s anti-rating was -538 (“10 people voted for him, 548 voted against him”), his closest pursuer was more than two hundred points behind him! And here Pokhlebaev was ahead of even his advisor Vanka: he was at least eleventh from the bottom in his ranking of applicants, and his owner was first!

“The Russian publication Kompromat-Ural wrote about the appointment of the head of the Federal Tax Service as the new prime minister several months before the event itself,” news reports appeared with similar headlines in a number of federal media the day before.

Thus, Polit.Ru (one of the first media outlets on the RuNet) notes that “the Russian publication wrote about the appointment of Mishustin as prime minister back in the fall of 2019.” We quote in more detail: “The Russian publication Kompromat-Ural wrote about the appointment of the head of the Federal Tax Service as the new prime minister several months before the event itself. An article with the headline “Mishun Dimona is not sweeter. Mishustin Mikhail Vladimirovich will sit in the chair of Prime Minister” was published in September 2019. The media outlet Info24 also drew attention to the surprisingly accurate prediction of the Kompromat-Ural editors.

It is noteworthy that Mikhail Mishustin (at least publicly) did not react to the September forecast in the Kompromat-Ural editorial feed. There was no official denial either.

Almost exactly four months after our forecast, January 15, 2020, Vladimir Putin proposed the candidacy of the head of the Federal Tax Service of Russia, Mikhail Mishustin, for the post of head of the Cabinet of Ministers. This happened after Dmitry Medvedev announced that the current government is resigning in its entirety. The resignation of the Cabinet was the result of the guidelines announced in the Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly. In his message, Putin announced the dismantling of the power structure that is provided for by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, in particular, he will go to reduce the powers of the president after he himself formally leaves this post and moves to another official status (of course, still “the most important person in the country” - Let's have no illusions.)

Some time ago, a notorious "figure" in the oil and gas industry Babaev Azad Kamalovich(RU-Energy company and related structures) published publications in the media that caused skepticism and irony in the expert community. It was reported with feigned pathos that Mr. Babaev himself wrote an open letter to the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Vladimir Kolokoltsev. According to the editors of Kompromat-Ural, the addressees of Babaev’s message also included the heads of police headquarters for the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and the Volgograd region - Alexander Udovenko And Alexander Kravchenko, respectively. In his opus to law enforcement bosses, Babaev complains about fate and the fact that he, they say, became a victim of his own internal family squabbles: he did not share the business with his uncle and cousins ​​( Kerimovs). Is it really true, according to Babaev, that Russian law enforcement officers have no more important things to do than to get involved in Caucasian clan conflicts based on the redistribution of financial flows?

A long-term squabble among southern businessmen is taking place over the redistribution of the Naftagaz group of companies. According to one of the versions spread in the media, both Naftagaz-Service and NG-Burenie were created on the production base of the Naftagaz company, which at the beginning of the 2000s was associated with Tokay Kerimov, a close friend of the chairman of the board of directors of the scandalous service holding RU-Energy, the same Azad Babayev. The holding accumulated hundreds of millions of debts to its partners and then went bankrupt.

The editors of Kompromat-Ural continue to study the negative media background around Babaev’s commerce. So, a year and a half ago, journalists conducted an investigation into how “Azad Babayev’s relatives got involved in a confrontation with Sberbank”...

Readers who have additional information about the activities of Roskomsnabbank (former sign - Bashkomsnabbank), which was controlled by a businessman close to the authorities of Bashkortostan, contacted the editors of Kompromat-Ural Flur Gallyamov(TIN 027408945156) and members of his family. In March 2019, the Gallyamovs’ “cash office” was covered with a wet hat. The Central Bank revoked the bank’s license for questionable transactions and repeated violations of the Federal Law “On Combating the Legalization (Laundering) of Proceeds from Crime and the Financing of Terrorism.” From the office of the Chairman of the Central Bank Elvira Nabiullina materials on the Gallyamov bank were sent “to the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation and the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for consideration and adoption of appropriate procedural decisions.”

“The activities of ROSKOMSNABBANK (PJSC) were marked by dishonest actions of the management related to the bank’s participation in the operations of its individual clients-legal entities, aimed at attracting funds from the population with unobvious prospects for their return according to a scheme that has signs of a “financial pyramid”. The credit institution accepted funds from individuals at an increased interest rate in favor of the client-legal entity, which were ultimately used to issue loans to a number of companies. At the same time, the repayment of obligations to individuals for such contributions was actually made at the expense of newly raised funds from the population.” In addition, “during the examination of the credit organization, signs were identified of the implementation of operations aimed at withdrawing Bashkomsnabbank’s assets by lending to borrowers who do not have the ability to fulfill their obligations,” the regulator notes in the materials.

Where is the criminal legal assessment of the identified frauds? Judging by the official silence of his subordinates Yuri Chaika and Lieutenant General of Justice Alexandra Romanova(Head of the SD of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Deputy Minister Vladimir Kolokoltsev), what the Central Bank auditors managed to dig up was quietly shelved by gentlemen law enforcement officers. Readers of the portal "Kompromat-Ural" in connection with the journalistic investigation of the "Bashkir Laundromat" recommend paying attention to the activities of another deputy minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs - the Secretary of State Igor Zubov. A very interesting person... “Another thing is surprising: in 2018, Roskomsnabbank received an award in the field of economics and finance named after P.A. Stolypin in the category “Best Regional Bank”! And it’s strange that no one noticed any big problems with balance. Or maybe they didn’t want to notice?” the competent interlocutors are perplexed.

Current publications

Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Alexander Bastrykin issued a number of orders aimed at preventing possible infection and spread of coronavirus infection (COVID-19) among department employees.

In particular, a decision was made to minimize the presence of women serving in the Investigative Committee of Russia in the workplace for the current week, until April 6. These measures are aimed, among other things, at the possibility of monitoring your children and ensuring their compliance with the self-isolation regime. This applies to women serving both in the central office of the department and in regional investigative units.

The measures taken by the Investigative Committee of Russia to self-isolate female employees will not affect the work of the department. During this period, the work of the central office and regional divisions of the Russian Investigative Committee will be carried out according to the work schedule. During the period of self-isolation of all women of the Investigative Committee, the Chairman instructed male officers to perform all their duties in full. This applies not only to the supporting structures of the department, but also, if necessary, male investigators will take over criminal cases investigated by female investigators.

In accordance with a separate order, men will continue to work in all educational institutions of the Russian Investigative Committee as usual, provided the necessary safety measures are in place to prevent the spread of the virus. In addition, the management of cadet corps and academies in Moscow and St. Petersburg has been instructed to continuously monitor students’ compliance with the self-isolation regime and the quality of their remote learning. Particular attention should be paid to orphans and children without parental care, ensuring their daily examination and monitoring of their health, disinfection of premises at their place of stay and compliance with isolation rules.

All regional divisions of the Investigative Committee of Russia have been instructed to establish remote communications with sponsored orphanages for the subsequent organization of targeted assistance. As part of these instructions, employees of regional investigative bodies need to provide assistance to students of specialized cadet classes of the Russian Investigative Committee located in the territories under their jurisdiction, preventing them from violating the established rules to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus infection.

“Is it possible to defeat a disease with the help of counterfeit?” - this is the rhetorical question asked by colleagues of the Kompromat-Ural editorial board, who studied “the continuation of the scandalous story with dubious medicines supplied by the companies ROUTEK and ROZLEX-PHARM, owned by an Indian citizen Samira Srivastava».

“As you know, impunity gives rise to permissiveness and pushes people to perform new “feats.” This happened with Samir Srivastava, who believed that he had been given the “green light” to implement new schemes.

This time, in addition to what can be called “falsification,” we are talking about much more serious violations. First of all, you should pay attention to the drug Levoflox-Routek, solution for infusion 5 mg/ml 100 ml, bottles (1) / complete with a disposable system for intravenous administration of solutions with a built-in ventilation barrier against bacteria “Eurodrip” / This is an antimicrobial drug with a wide spectrum of action, which is often used in medical institutions in particularly severe cases.

So, according to the documents, this drug is packaged in the Russian Federation by the company Rozlex Pharm, and it is produced outside the country, namely in India.

The packaging of any medicinal product must contain the manufacturer's information, his address and license number. Levoflox-Routek packages contain this information, but the address and name of the manufacturer do not seem to match the license number. It turns out that the packaging contains data from two manufacturers at the same time, and which one exactly produced what is in the packaging is unknown. In relation to a medicinal product, such an “error” is unacceptable and should lead to the immediate withdrawal of the entire batch of drugs. Relevant requests have been sent to the manufacturers indicated on the packaging, but responses have not yet been received. It may also turn out that none of the manufacturers admit that this drug was produced by them, then what is it? Counterfeit?

It turns out that it is impossible to reliably determine where exactly and by whom exactly this drug was produced; therefore, if questions arise, there is no one to make quality claims to. Instead of an antimicrobial drug, the containers can contain anything; professionals understand that such “medicines” are unlikely to help patients... well, if they don’t harm. But at the same time, this drug is supplied with impunity to medical institutions throughout our country. Will our doctors be able to cure someone using such drugs? Why don't law enforcement agencies respond to such actions?

Leading world-famous Russian economists have demanded the introduction of a strict quarantine in Russia to prevent the further spread of coronavirus infection. The statement was published on the page Facebook Professor at the University of Chicago and the Higher School of Economics Konstantin Sonina.

The Kremlin has read a letter from well-known economists, in which they stated that the government should spend from 5 trillion to 10 trillion rubles to support enterprises, citizens and banks, the presidential press secretary said Dmitry Peskov.

Experts particularly criticized the strange decision to introduce a non-working week. “The fact that our economy is experiencing a recession along with the whole world is already obvious. And an extra non-working week will only intensify this decline,” said the director of the analytical department of Loko-Invest. Kirill Tremasov. At the same time, the expert is perplexed why a week off was announced at the expense of employers. “This measure clearly contradicts the goal of supporting business during the epidemic. And it is completely unclear how one week can solve the problem of spreading the virus (even if everyone stays at home). We have just begun an accelerated growth in the number of infected people, and according to the experience of other countries, this process does not stop within a week,” the analyst emphasized. The proposal for everyone to “take a break” is of particular concern to business representatives. At a meeting of entrepreneurs with Vladimir Putin March 26, founder of the Anderson cafe chain Anastasia Tatulova stated that a number of industries have no safety net, and this is “simply a tragedy.”

At the request of readers, the editors of Kompromat-Ural publish verbatim an appeal from economic gurus to combat COVID-19...

The Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation analyzed the practice of prosecutorial supervision in the implementation of national projects “Small and medium-sized businesses and support for individual entrepreneurial initiative”, “Labor productivity and employment support” and “International cooperation and export”.

Taking into account the importance of creating favorable conditions for doing business in the country, prosecutors closely monitor the proper implementation of the activities of the national project “Small and Medium Enterprises and Support for Individual Entrepreneurial Initiatives.”

During his supervisory support, measures were taken to eliminate about 400 violations of the law, 143 submissions were made, 71 persons were brought to disciplinary and administrative liability, 2 statements were sent to the courts, 7 officials were warned about the inadmissibility of violating the law, 1 criminal case was initiated based on the inspection material sent by the prosecutor case.

One of the reasons for the incomplete use of budget funds is the long-term failure of authorized bodies to accept procedures for providing financial support to business entities.

In the Chelyabinsk region, a prosecutor's response was required due to the untimely approval by the regional ministries of economic development and agriculture of procedures for providing subsidies to entrepreneurs and agricultural producers, as a result of which more than 60 million rubles of financial assistance to business remained unspent.

In the republics of Adygea, Bashkortostan, Crimea, Tyva and Khakassia, Altai and Krasnoyarsk territories, Kemerovo, Kirov, Kursk, Nizhny Novgorod, Orenburg and Penza regions, the Nenets Autonomous District and the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous District - Ugra, prosecutors took measures to ensure the formation of a legal basis for the implementation of the specified national project and suppression of cases of imposing responsibilities not provided for by law on entrepreneurs. In total, prosecutors protested 38 illegal regulatory legal acts.

In a number of regions, prosecutorial intervention was required due to inadequate information support for small and medium-sized businesses (the Republic of Crimea, Tyva, Altai Territory, Voronezh, Rostov, Tyumen and Ulyanovsk regions, Sevastopol).

By means of prosecutorial supervision, violations of the procedure and conditions for providing assistance to entrepreneurs were suppressed (Udmurt Republic, Kamchatka and Krasnoyarsk territories, Bryansk, Kaliningrad, Kaluga, Kemerovo, Kostroma, Murmansk, Nizhny Novgorod, Omsk, Ryazan, Samara, Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk regions).

A fundamental assessment of prosecutors was required in cases of failure to achieve target indicators of regional projects during the implementation of a national project (Krasnoyarsk Territory, Samara Region).

Judge of the Shcherbinsky District Court of Moscow Anna Boriskina received from a lawyer Alexandra Zabrodina a strange lawsuit that could have “viral” consequences for the entire law enforcement system. Businessman from Sevastopol, director and founder of the one-employee company Inter 2012 LLC Yuri Hermann(his interests are represented by Mr. Zabrodin) demands a ban on the disclosure of his individual taxpayer number (TIN) under the pretext of protecting “personal data.” According to experts, what makes the situation especially scandalous is the fact that the tax identification numbers of tens of millions of Russians have been openly published in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities for many years in a row as part of innovations to increase the transparency of the business environment, organized by Mikhail Mishustin during the period of his leadership of the Federal Tax Service (FTS). Public access to the numbers of individuals is in accordance with the international practice of fiscal authorities. Lawyer Zabrodin avoided questions from journalists.

Yuri German’s claims against online publications became known recently, although his claim was submitted to the Shcherbinsky District Court in early July 2019. It is noteworthy that Anna Boriskina, who is considering the case, was appointed as a federal judge only in November last year; before that, Anna Vladimirovna was a justice of the peace (court district No. 432 of the Moskovsky and Mosrentgen settlements of Moscow). According to journalists, the plaintiff did not contact the editorial office directly. “The position is illogical, and the claim itself seems far-fetched. In the summer of 2018, an article is published, for some reason you “endure” for almost a year, only then do you file a claim. Months go by, already years. The publication remains, and you have never written to the editor about the essence of your dissatisfaction, so as to at least try to remove yourself from the public without a trial. How is this possible?” asked a lawyer we interviewed, who was familiar with the details of the process.

Mr. German is dissatisfied with the occasional mention of his person in a journalistic investigation published in August 2018 about the former beneficiary of the Dialog-Optim bank. Alexandra Polyakov, against whom criminal cases were initiated in Russia and Ukraine (on the facts of fraud on an especially large scale and the use of a deliberately fake passport to cross the border). According to the latest data, after illegally leaving Ukraine, Polyakov settled in Slovenia. Journalists drew attention to a number of legal entities that, after Polyakov left the Russian Federation and was put on the wanted list, continued to function in Moscow and were registered with his wife Larisa Sliwinskaya and sons: Kirill And Mikhail Polyakov.

We hope our readers remember the epic with attempts to get answers from the general director of Mayak PA and deputy of the regional Legislative Assembly Mikhail Pokhlebaev to the questions asked to him by Ozersk residents.

Let us briefly recall that in the spring of this year the editors of the site announced an information campaign “People's Question”, during which questions asked to him by city residents were collected and transmitted to M. Pokhlebaev’s reception on May 11. A month later, without waiting for answers, the editors sent a letter to the prosecutor's office of the ZATO city of Ozersk with a request to conduct an investigation into the violation of citizens' rights to provide information and, if necessary, take prosecutorial response measures.

A response was received to this letter signed by... O. city ​​prosecutor, senior justice adviser V. Kravtsov.

« When checking the questions attached to the letter, it was found that they do not meet the requirements... Art. 7 of the Federal Law of May 2, 2006 No. 59-FZ “On the procedure for considering appeals from citizens of the Russian Federation.” In this connection, the above issues are left without consideration. In addition, according to the response of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise PA "Mayak" to the request of the prosecutor's office sent as part of the inspection, some of the statements that are designated as questions from readers are offensive in nature... Thus, during the investigation by the prosecutor's office of the ZATO of Ozersk, no investigation was found regarding your appeal grounds for taking prosecutorial response measures...»

In addition to M. Pokhlebaev’s “insults” in response to direct questions from his constituents, the prosecutor’s office saw a violation of the procedure for citizens’ requests in the fact that the questions were asked not from a specific person with a very specific address to which an answer could be sent, but from a certain indefinite group of people - “readers” .

Paragraph 3 of Article 11 of the Law “On the procedure for considering appeals from citizens of the Russian Federation” says: “ A state body, local government body or official, upon receipt of a written appeal that contains obscene or offensive language... has the right to leave the appeal unanswered on the merits of the questions raised in it and inform the citizen who sent the appeal about the inadmissibility of abuse of rights».

That is, even if the questions asked to Pokhlebaev by the residents of Ozersk really seemed offensive ( although it is not customary to be offended by the truth), he was still obliged to answer. At least write something like “I don’t like your questions, and I spit on you.” And do it ( don't spit, but answer) within 30 days from the date of registration of the written request.

Okay, we are not proud, we tried again. Now, in accordance with all the rules of appeals, a letter with questions to M. Pokhlebaev’s reception was submitted from a very specific person - one of the editorial staff, indicating his home address and telephone number. As expected, there was no response from Mikhalvanovich again. We are writing another appeal to the prosecutor’s office - in exactly the same way, in accordance with all legal requirements. And the prosecutor in Ozersk had changed by that time, we think - let him show his integrity, this is just a convenient opportunity for this.

And then the other day an answer came, already signed by the new prosecutor, Justice Advisor Alexei Vakhrushev. As they say, guess twice what is written there? That's right - refusal again. Only the version is different, read more carefully.

“...The goals of the activities of FSUE PA Mayak, according to the Charter of the enterprise, are the development and manufacture of certain types of products, the implementation of scientific and scientific-technical activities, the use of property and making a profit. FSUE PA "Mayak" is not an organization that carries out publicly significant functions... Accordingly, the general director of FSUE PA "Mayak" cannot be classified as one of the officials whose procedure for considering appeals is regulated by Federal Law No. 59-FZ of May 2, 2006 "On Procedure consideration of appeals from citizens of the Russian Federation..." There are no objective grounds for taking prosecutorial response measures based on the results of the inspection..."

There it is, Mikhalych! M. Pokhlebaev - it turns out that he is not an official and does not perform publicly significant functions, and therefore there can be no demand from him. Interestingly, is being in the status of a deputy of the Legislative Assembly of the Chelyabinsk Region also not “exercising publicly significant functions”? After all, among the questions asked to him by Ozersk residents were those that directly related to his deputy activities. What law will you adjust this to, gentlemen, prosecutors?